|
The Riddle of Mumbai
By Abdollah Shahbazi
Written: 29th November 2008
Translated: 11th December 2008
I was very busy Wednesday night and Thursday morning and
consequently away from news. On Thursday evening I was awaken by
a call from one of my friends. He told me about massive
explosions and terror in Mumbai. Since then I have been
following this strange event closely.
Details of the event can be studied in news websites. It can be
summarized as such:
Around 21:30, Wednesday 26th
of November, a number of men armed with automatic weapons landed
from boats in front of the Gateway of India, located at the
beach of Mumbai and in front of the Taj Mahal Hotel, as reported
by CNN and the police. These people, as if following a Hollywood
action movie style, separated into different groups. They start
shooting and killing people and take possession of a number of
cars, including a police van. They then go to the Taj Mahal
Hotel, Hotel Oberoi Trident and Café Leopold; all three being
centers of tourist’s residence and gathering. Their other
targets included the CST train station (Victoria station), Cama
& Albless Hospital and
the synagogue of a Jewish sect called CHABAD. They kill
people and take hostages.
Reports mention around 200 killed and 300 wounded and rising.
The most notable of the victims is the former rabbi of CHABAD of
New York’s Brooklyn and his wife.
This event has
particularly affected the New York Jews of all sects and has
turned Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka, into symbols
of victims of terrorism. Zionists and the government of Israel
have also become the hosts of mourning and are using the blood
of Rabbi Holtzberg and his wife and other Jews killed in the
CHABAD synagogue of Mumbai to gain sympathy and advertise in
favor of Zionism.
Who were the attackers?
This is the question that
The Christian Science Monitor has asked in its edition of
Friday 28th
of November.
Street fighting was still going on and the event was not yet
over that Indian officials accused “foreign elements”, meaning
the government of Pakistan. Naturally, Pakistani officials
immediately denied the allegations. The
Hindu, apparently
craving a new war between India and Pakistan, followed the same
and again in the middle of an ongoing event and without any
proper evidence announced that the terrorists are members of the
“Lashkar-e-Taiba”
(The Pure Army), a militant group
based in Pakistan.
The Washington Post,
quoting “US
counterterrorism experts”
wrote
“the
attacks appear to be well coordinated, indicating that the
attackers received foreign terrorist training and support.”
These “experts” had “hidden knowledge” as well and called the
attackers “Muslim” and called their act “Jihad”. This newspaper,
the most
circulated in Washington, D.C.,
has been owned since 1933 by the Jew plutocrat family of Meyer-
Graham. They are the descendants of Eugene Meyer, the first head
of The World Bank.
This newspaper added, quoting
Bruce Riedel, a former South Asia analyst for the CIA and
National Security Council and author of The Search for Al
Qaeda,
“This
is a new, horrific milestone in the global jihad.” Roger
W. Cressey, a former White House counterterrorism official in
the Clinton and Bush administrations
also said:
“This group had to receive some training or support from
professionals in the terrorism business.”
The New York Times,
The largest
metropolitan newspaper in the United States,
owned since 1935 by the Jew plutocrat family of Sulzberger, made
things much simpler for us and without any evidence or reason
suggested that the “gunmen could easily be
members of India's Muslim minority”.
Adding “There
are a lot of very, very angry Muslims.”
The
Guardian
reported that “the gunmen were more likely to be homegrown
Indian terrorists,
rather than foreigners.”
and laid its suspicion on an unknown group called the “Deccan
Mujahideen”
and certain others; who all happen to be Muslims. Their
reason was certain emails sent to the media signed by this
group.
3-What is the result of my research?
Counterterrorism expert’s ideas are correct. The attackers
were definitely professionals and there is definitely a “foreign
hand” in the event. It was fully organized to the last
detail. Even the target locations were chosen in detail and with
particular objectives. Those choices needed specialized
historical and political knowledge.
4- Choosing the Taj Mahal Hotel as the main target is worth some
thought. Millions of people worldwide watched the historic and
majestic view of the Taj Mahal Hotel burn for two days. This
was in effect very similar to the fate of the Twin Towers of New
York on September 11th 2001.
Both were important
symbols of the two cities: the Twin Towers were symbols of New
York as the commercial and financial centre of the western
world. The Taj Mahal Hotel was the best known symbol of Mumbai,
a city which until the first half of the twentieth century was
the commercial and financial centre of the East.
This hotel was opened in 1903. It coincided with the reign of
Mozaffar Al Din Shah of Qajar of Iran and shortly before the
beginning of the Constitutional revolution in Iran. Once opened,
it was the grandest eastern hotel. In our time it was one of the
most beautiful historical buildings of Mumbai and India. I have
seen this hotel. Though very grand and beautiful, it was aged
and in need of repair and restoration. This restoration can and
will take place now; quite possibly from the pocket of the
Indian government.
The Taj Mahal Hotel belongs to the Tata family. They are
a family of the Parsis of India; native Zoroastrians of Indian
origin claiming an ancient Persian origin. They are considered
one of the richest families of the world. This family, like
other plutocrat Parsis of India, gained its initial wealth from
the Opium trade of the 19th century. The 6th Volume of my
Jew and Parsi Plutocrats, which is still to be published,
deals with the “Parsi oligarchy of India” and their partnership
with Jew, American and English plutocrats.
This was a relationship that made history. The Tata family,
like the rest of the Parsi plutocrats, has deep Masonic and
Zionist connections and old partnership and relations with Jew
plutocrats. An important portion of India’s industry and trade
belongs to this oligarchy.
Me in front of the Gateway of India (1993)
This
monument, similar to the triumphal arches of Europe, was
constructed between 1911 to 1924 in commemoration of The King of
Britain and Emperor of India, George the Fifth’s, visit to India
Me in front of the Hotel Taj Mahal (1993)
5- Can such an attack on the synagogue of the Jewish CHABAD sect
in Mumbai, exactly when the former Rabbi of Brooklyn and his
family were there, be considered a coincidence? If the attackers
were “anti-Jewish”, shouldn’t they have occupied the great
synagogue of Mumbai Jews, the
Keneseth Eliyahoo Synagogue,
which has 150 years of history, and taken its residents hostage?
This is the synagogue that Sir Jacob Sassoon built in 1886 and
named it after his father, Elijah Sassoon. Elijah Sassoon was
the second son of David Sassoon, a famous Jew plutocrat
and founder of the “Sassoon Empire” in the East, and
brother of Sir Albert (Abdullah) Sassoon. I have written
extensively about the Sassoon family, their connections with the
Rothschilds and their role in the formation of new
Imperialism. Therefore my detailed research about this family,
and their great role in India and Iran, will be published in the
later volumes of my book. Isn’t the important and historical Eliyahoo Synagogue, the most important synagogue of Mumbai Jews, located near the Apollo port, Hotel Taj Mahal and the Museum of Prince of Wales? Why should the small and unknown building of the CHABAD sect, with its small number of members, have been occupied? This building is located further away from the “centre of operation” (Hotel Taj Mahal and Apollo port) and is harder to find. In satellite pictures, you can easily see that the Eliyahoo Synagogue (The main synagogue of Mumbai) is quite close to the Hotel while the “Nariman Building”, the location of the small synagogue of the CHABAD sect, is quite far. These pictures make it clear that occupying the CHABAD sect’s synagogue, killing Rabbi Holtzberg, one of the main leaders of CHABAD, together with his wife and other CHABAD members present in the mentioned synagogue was one of the main objectives of the operation. This was not an accidental and random hate killing of Jews.
The main old synagogue of Mumbai, the
Eliyahoo (Sassoon) Synagogue, near Hotel Taj Mahal and Cafe
Leopold.
The far off and little known building of
the CHABAD sect, which was attacked
1- Hotel Taj Mahal (The main
target of the terrorist operation)
The
very close distance between Hotel Taj Mahal and the main
synagogue of Mumbai (The Eliyahoo Synagogue) is evident in this
picture. If the terrorists were truly anti Zionists or anti
Jewish, why didn’t they occupy this synagogue, which was on
their way? Why did they take the
long way to occupy the small and little known building of the
synagogue of the CHABAD sect? Would it be far fetched to assume
that the planners of the Mumbai tragedy removed the historical
building of the Eliyahoo synagogue from their operation, perhaps
due to personal affection or some debt to that place?
1- Hotel Taj Mahal
6- The attackers did not take “Zionist
Jews” or even “ordinary Jews” hostage and they did not brutally
kill
their
known Rabbi. They chose distinguished members of CHABAD.
CHABAD is a sect of Hasidic Judaism. Hasidim are orthodox Jews
who consider themselves pious and that is the reason they have
chosen this name. Hasid means piety and Hasidim means the pious.
CHABAD is a 250 years old sect that originated in the town of
Lubavitch, a small town in Tsarist Russia. Therefore it was
named “CHABAD-Lubavitch”. Today, this sect is known as one of
the largest sect of Orthodox Jews and has about two hundred
thousand followers. The name of this sect is made from the three
Hebrew words of “Chochmah” (Wisdom), “Binah” (Understanding) and
“Da’at” (Knowledge). Actually the name should be pronounced
“HABAD”. The CHABAD
is a sect of pious Jews who neither have anything in common with
“Political Judaism” nor accept religious and political Zionism.
They do not recognize the State of Israel.
One website displayed a letter from the fifth leader of the
CHABAD and wrote this about them:
CHABAD leaders in recent years have shown sympathy to
cooperation with Putin and the Russian government. This has
caused worry among the Zionists leaders and Israel.
The policy of Putin’s government is similar to that of the
Tsarist Russia’s, which empowered Karaite Judaism against
Talmudic ones (Rabbinical Oligarchy). Now they empower CHABAD
against Zionist Jews. An example of following this policy was
Putin’s giving of a golden medal to Mendel Pewzner, a CHABAD
Rabbi, in 2003. In 2005, the great Rabbi of Russian Jews,
Pinkhas Goldschmidt, was prevented from entering Russia after
his trip to Israel and was replaced by Berel Lazar as the new
Chief Rabbi of Russia. Zionists called this act of Putin
“Stalinist”.
Meeting of Berel Lazar, the Rabbi of CHABAD,
with Vladimir Putin
7- The attack on the small synagogue of CHABAD Jews in the
“Nariman building” of Mumbai, taking the 29 year old CHABAD
rabbi and his wife and children hostage and their brutal killing
and the consequent cry the blues of the Israeli official and
Zionists, reminds me of the massacre of the Karaites of Al Qods
(Jerusalem) during the Crusades at the hands of the Crusaders;
Those bloodthirsty knights who Zionists today generously keep
their memory alive in their Hollywood blockbusters, and their
corrupt leader,
Jacques de Molay,
who occupies a saintly place in Freemasonry. In the second half
of the Eleventh Century, a group of crusader knights, led by
Godfrey of
Bouillon,
were influenced by Rabbinical Oligarchy to imprison Karaites in
their synagogue and burn the building down. In the official
history of Jews, this event is portrayed as another oppression
of the “Jews”. It is hardly ever mentioned
who influenced
the crusader knights, who were partners with opportunist Jew
Oligarchs, to create this horrendous tragedy.
Notes:
Karaites in Persian Qarai’un, in English Qara’ism; meaning
Readers [of Scripture]):
In the Second century Hijri/ Eight century AD, the authoritarian
rule of Rabbinic- Talmudic oligarchy (Hakhamim, Hakhams) caused
opposition amongst Jews and led to the creation of a powerful
movement against them. Leading this movement was Annan ibn
Davoud (Anan ben David). Annan lived around 135- 159 Hijri (754-
775 AD) in Baghdad, during the time of the Abbasid Caliph Al
Mansur. His followers were initially known as “Annan’ie” and
later were named “Karaites”. Other Jews called them “Bani Mikra”
or “Beile Mikra” (The tribe of Mikra). “Mikra” (מקרא)
means
“reading” or “that which is read”.
This was because they recognized the original and early
scriptures as the only valid source of religious wisdom and
denied the oral tradition that the Rabbinical- Talmudic Jewish
had spread in recent centuries. As written in Karaite documents,
Hakhams first tried to gain support of Annan, but were
unsuccessful. Annan was later imprisoned on orders of Caliph Al
Mansur (Quite possibly due to the conspiracy of Jewish leaders).
Abu Hanifa, one of the great Muslim Scholars, advised him in
prison to talk about similarity of his views with Islamic ones
in front of the Caliph and he was forgiven by doing so. Annan
took some of his ideas from Islam and was influenced by Abu
Hanifa. He was especially against the closed society of Jews and
the forbiddance of relation with non-Jews. In the second half of
the Ninth century AD, the ideas of Annan ibn Davoud were taken
by Benyamin ibn Moosa (Benjamin ben Moses) Nahawandi and were
formulated into an influential sect. (Nahavand is a city in
Persia/ Iran.) His role in the sect was to such an extent that
Arabic sources mention the sect as the “followers of Annan and
Benjamin”. Between Eight to Eleventh century AD, the Karaites
centre of activity was in the Arabian Peninsula and was later
spread further among the Jews of Asia Minor. Among the Jews,
Karaites were the most serious threat to the Hakhams (Hakhamim)
and Rabbinical Oligarchy up until the coming of the European
movement of Haskalah (enlightenment)
in the late 18 century. The Encyclopaedia
Judaica (1971, vol. 10, p. 764) mentions “the tremendous
religious, political, and economic fermentation in the entire
East, resulting from... the collision of Islam with world
religions; and the social and economic grievances of the poorer
classes of Jewry” as the main reason for founding of the Karaite
sect. From the Fourth century Hijri/ Tenth century AD, a group
of distinguished scholars came to being amongst the Karaites who
wrote in Arabic and this sect became a powerful force among the
Jews, seriously challenging the Rabbinical- Talmudic version of
Judaism. At this time, the main centers of Karaites were in
Persia (Iran), Mesopotamia, Al Qods (Palestine), Egypt and North
Africa. It was at this time that Jewish Hakhams started writing
books against Annan and Karaism. It is interesting to know that
both the writings of the Karaites and those written against them
by the Hakhamim were in Arabic. At the time of the Crusader
oligarchy of Europe’s attack on Al Qods (second half of the 11th
century AD), Crusader knights destroyed the centre of Karaites
in Al Qods (Jerusalem) in the horrible fashion that was
mentioned earlier. This was a heavy blow against the Karaites.
From then until the 15th century AD Egypt became their main
refuge. In the 14th to 16th centuries some of the Karaites were
in the Asia Minor. In the 17 and 18 centuries their main centre
was moved to Crimea and Lithuania. At the end of the 18 century
these lands were added to the Russian Empire. At first, Russian
rulers did not distinguish between Karaites and Talmudic Jews
and treated both in the same fashion. It was from the time of
Catherine the Second (The Great) that the difference between the
Karaites and other Jews was discovered. Thereafter more
attention was given to them and they received special
treatments. At the time of Nicolai the First, Karaite leaders
went to the Tsarist officials and announced that they are
different from Rabbanites; that they are good citizens,
industrious and politically loyal. Russian officials understood
their distinguished position more and in 1863 gave them full
Russian citizenship and rights. In 1932 their number was
reported as ten thousand and they lived mostly in Crimea. At
this time around 2000 Karaites lived outside of Russia in
Poland, Constantinople, Al Qods (Palestine), Egypt and
Mesopotamia (Iraq). In January of 1932 the government of Germany
announced that it does not consider the Karaites Jewish.
Therefore they were not harmed from Germany’s attacks during
World War II. In 1970 the number of Karaites residing in Israel
was reported as seven thousand, who mostly lived in Ramleh,
Ashdod and Beer- Sheva.
Knights Templar:
The Order of the Poor Knights of Christ and of the Temple of
Solomon was at first name of a group of French knights which was
formed in Al Qods (Jerusalem) in 1118 AD by the Crusaders. This
group was gradually expanded and was formed into a mercenary
military force that sold its services to the Crusader rulers.
They rose greatly in military power and took charge of the
transport of gold and other looted treasures from the East to
Europe. After the end of the Crusades in 1291 they returned to
Europe. Having got used to years of killing, caravan raiding and
piracy, they naturally felt restless in their new surroundings.
Therefore they kept their organization, chose for themselves a
leader with the title of “The Grand Master” and continued their
operations in a secret fashion. Their continued operation was
considered a threat to the security of France and in 1304,
Philip the 4th, King of France, ordered their arrest. Many of
them were imprisoned and were tried in Papal and French courts.
In 1312, Pope ordered the order to be closed down and King
Philip publicly executed a number of the leaders of the group,
including Jacques De Molay, the last “Grand Master” who was from
the nobility. The remaining Templars fled to Portugal and
created a new order called the “Knights of Christ”. This group
had the main role in Portugal’s colonial activity in North
Africa and the East and the later founding of Portugal’s
colonial Empire. The flag of this group was the same as the one
of the Knights Templar: a red cross on a white background, which
today happens to be the flag of International Red Cross. In our
time, the Knights Templar are an important branch of Freemasonry
with their own special orders and conducts. For example, the
Grand Master is called “The Grand commander”. In all Masonic
sects, the name and memory of Jacques De Molay is greatly
venerated and Philip the 4th is extremely hated.
Abdollah Shahbazi (b. 1955) is author
of
The Jew and Parsi Plutocrats: British Imperialism and Iran,
7 vol. in Persian:
Vol. 1 in two parts: 1- Overseas Plunder and the new Western
Civilization, 2- Jews and the Jewish Oligarchy (543 pp.)
Vol. 2: The Jewish Oligarchy and the Formation of Global
Plutocracy (625 pp.)
Vol. 3: Aristocracy and the new West (553 pp.)
Vol. 4: Early History of Freemasonry (586 pp.)
Vol. 5: Financial Aristocracy and the collapse of the
Traditional Order (448 pp.) Vol. 6 and 7 are about
the Parsi sect, Parsi Oligarchy of India and the role of Global
Plutocracy in the contemporary history of Iran (to be
published). |
Friday, February 20, 2009 : تاريخ آخرين ويرايش کليه حقوق مندرجات اين صفحه براي عبدالله شهبازي محفوظ است. آدرس ايميل: abdollah.shahbazi@gmail.com ااستفاده از مقالات با ذکر ماخذ مجاز است. چاپ مقالات به صورت کتاب ممنوع است. |